As I begin the task of writing this article, I find myself engaged in profound introspection, pondering the intricate tapestry woven by numerous ideas and experiences that have shaped the very foundation of my worldview. Within this introspective context, I intend to investigate the intriguing realm of “young conservatives” and their complex relationship with the realm of aesthetic modernity. This enthralling topic, which is both enticing and perplexing, has captivated my attention, and I am eager to share my thoughts on it with you, dear reader.

Immersed in the realms of aesthetics and modernity, the “young conservatives” emerge as a striking paradox, their position embodying a perplexing convergence of ideologies. They embrace the liberating principles of decentralized subjectivity, thereby liberating themselves from the shackles of menial labor and practical utility. In doing so, however, they voluntarily detach themselves from the very fabric of the contemporary world, seeking refuge in an alternate reality shaped by the contours of their unique experiences and perspectives.

In numerous ways, the ideological disposition of the young conservatives is a logical extension of the modernist sensibilities that have irrevocably shaped our artistic and intellectual milieu. These young conservative thought leaders justify their seemingly irreconcilable anti-modernist stance in a manner comparable to the modernists’ rejection of the prevailing norms of their own era. In the same way that their modernist predecessors clearly distinguished the utilitarian realm governed by instrumental reason from the ethereal realm accessible only through invocation, so do these modern adherents of conservatism.

The young conservatives’ relegation of certain aspects of the human experience to the realm of the distant and archaic is particularly intriguing. In their current reality, they perceive the spontaneous faculties of imagination, personal experience, and emotion as relics of a bygone era, alien to their own intrinsic nature. They observe these aspects of human existence through the lens of temporal and spatial distance, as if they were relics of a bygone era incompatible with their contemporary essence.

This Manichaean dichotomy, which boldly juxtaposes instrumental reason with an invoked principle, provokes profound reflection. It inspires reflection on the fundamental nature of human existence and the complex relationship between our rational and intuitive faculties. Can these two realms coexist in harmony, or are they doomed to an eternity of discordant conflict?

Indeed, my musings encompass notions of free will and independence. These ideas are fervently supported by young conservatives, who promote them as gateways to the realm of individual authenticity and autonomy. Through the cultivation of their indomitable willpower and the assertive assertion of their sovereignty, they intend to transcend the constraints of the contemporary milieu and tap into the profound depths of their own being.

Moreover, the young conservatives invoke Being, an ethereal and transcendent force that transcends the boundaries of instrumental reason. They seek to liberate the poetic, Dionysian, and unrestrained aspects of the human experience through their connection to this primordial force. This journey of self-discovery captivates the mind with its elusiveness and enigmatical nature.

Within these confines, I am reminded of my own journey through the labyrinth of aesthetics and self-discovery. My own ambitions have involved reconciling ostensibly disparate realms: the dialectic between reason and intuition, the enthralling complexities of modernity juxtaposed with the time-honored allure of the ancient. I have also traversed the corridors of my imagination in an attempt to comprehend the forces that shape my artistic sensibilities and intellectual pursuits.

As we delve deeper into this intriguing topic, it becomes clearer that the young conservatives’ embrace of irreconcilable anti-modernism is more than a simple rejection of the prevailing status quo. It embodies a fervent desire to reawaken the dormant wells of human creativity and imagination in the contemporary era.

Their effort to relegate imagination, personal experience, and emotion to the realm of the remote and archaic demonstrates their belief in the transformative capacity of these faculties. They hope to reclaim the spontaneity and vitality of the human spirit by distancing themselves from the inescapable demands of labor and utility.

The mode of operation of the young conservatives produces a stark contrast between instrumental reason, which they associate with the pragmatic and utilitarian aspects of modernity, and an invocational principle. This principle, whether interpreted as indomitable willpower, assertive sovereignty, transcendent Being, or the Dionysian force of the poetic, represents an alternative mode of interacting with the world that transcends the limitations of rationality.

They find solace and authenticity within the realm of invocation, as it is within this realm that they tap into a source of creative energy and personal agency. They assert the ability to shape their own destinies and navigate the labyrinthine complexities of existence on their own terms, owing to their unyielding willpower and unwavering assertion of independence.

Moreover, these young conservatives’ invocation of Being as a transcendental force has profound philosophical implications. It offers a way to delve deeper into the profound recesses of the individual’s place within the vast tapestry of existence, resonating humanity’s timeless existential yearning for meaning and purpose.

Through their pursuit of the poetic, these young conservatism adherents enthusiastically embrace the Dionysian facets of the human experience. They endeavor to defy societal norms and conventions, immersing themselves in the intoxicating intensity of emotions and the unrestrained power of artistic expression.

As I contemplate the profound implications of these ideas, I cannot help but draw parallels to my own philosophical journey. In my own intellectual odyssey, I, too, have struggled with the delicate balance between reason and intuition, between the demands of the contemporary environment and the desire for a deeper connection with the essence of being. It is a delicate dance, a delicate interplay that requires us to navigate the multifaceted complexities of existence while remaining open to the limitless possibilities that exist beyond the realm of instrumental reason.

Ultimately, the embrace of aesthetic modernity by young conservatives compels us to question the prevailing paradigms that govern our lives. It compels us to reevaluate the dichotomy between reason and intuition, to explore the unrealized potential of our own creative faculties, and to contemplate the transformative power of invocation as we pursue authenticity and self-discovery.

As we continue on this intellectual journey, let us delve more deeply into the perspective of these young conservatives, as it will serve as a springboard for our own philosophical reflections. May their ardent yearning for a deeper connection with the source of human experience inspire us to embark on a journey of self-discovery and creative exploration.

Charles Taylor, “A Secular Age” (Canada)
Alain de Botton, “The Architecture of Happiness” (United Kingdom)
Roger Scruton, “Beauty: A Very Short Introduction” (United Kingdom)
Arthur C. Danto, “The Abuse of Beauty: Aesthetics and the Concept of Art” (United States)
Peter Sloterdijk, “You Must Change Your Life: On Anthropotechnics” (Germany)
Jacques Rancière, “Aisthesis: Scenes from the Aesthetic Regime of Art” (France)
Harold Bloom, “The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry” (United States)
Camille Paglia, “Sexual Personae: Art and Decadence from Nefertiti to Emily Dickinson” (United States)
Friedrich Nietzsche, “The Birth of Tragedy” (Germany)
Hans-Georg Gadamer, “Truth and Method” (Germany)