, , , , , ,

Collage as Radical Citation: Post-Criticism Unleashed

In the profound realm of philosophical exploration, the discerning visual artist scrutinizes Western logocentrism. Jacques Derrida’s impassioned critique challenges the rigidity of language, asserting its essence lies not in fixed correspondences but in dynamic pairers, unleashing boundless potential for reinterpretation and recontextualization.


min read


The perspicacious visual artist finds it incumbent to scrutinize the perennial inclination of Western philosophy towards logocentrism, a predilection that has woven its threads throughout the convoluted fabric of its multifaceted history. It is the venerable Jacques Derrida, an illustrious luminary in the realm of linguistics, who, with resolute conviction, articulates a fervent critique of this logocentric proclivity in his seminal treatise on grammatical analysis.

In the discerning eyes of Derrida, the pursuit of logocentrism stands in brazen defiance of the authentic essence of language, a essence that refuses to be shackled within the rigid confines of unequivocal correspondences between signifiers and signifieds. Rather, language pulsates with vitality in the realm of pairers or couplers, acting as intermediaries that weave intricate connections between ostensibly disparate entities. Herein lies the crux: language, in its truest essence, does not find its domicile in the ossification of fixed correspondences but rather revels in the perpetual dance and fluidity engendered by these pairers.

In the expansive terrain of linguistic communion, every sign, whether born of linguistic or non-linguistic provenance, assumes the capacious potential to be ensconced within the embrace of quotation. The act of quoting, realized through the isolation of a sign within the protective demarcations of quotation marks, transgresses the preordained bounds of any entrenched context, engendering an unbounded proliferation of novel contexts that span the furthest reaches of human imagination and conceptual exploration. This rupture, the act of quoting, becomes the catalytic force for the efflorescence of an infinite realm wherein reinterpretation and recontextualization flourish, encapsulating the veritable lifeblood of language itself.

At this juncture, it becomes imperatively exigent to underscore the nexus between literary collage and citation, for both realms pivot upon the axial mode of operation designated as quoting, albeit traversing divergent trajectories of significance. In the realm of literature, collage unfolds as citation—an intentional and artistic intertwining of borrowed fragments, ideas, and expressions to coalesce into a harmonious and evocative composition. However, upon traversing into the precincts of post-criticism, the nature of collage undergoes a transmutation, transgressing conventional demarcations to become the “borderline case” of citation. In this iteration, the act of citation undergoes an intensified and radical metamorphosis, birthing a stratum of inventiveness and meaning-making hitherto uncharted.

The grammatology expounded by Derrida unfurls a theoretical framework of profound implications, probing the essence of writing as an appointment—a transformative function serving as a conduit for dialogues between disparate ideas, thereby facilitating connections that transcend the confines of traditional categorical distinctions. When subjected to the lens of grammatical analysis, the act of writing metamorphoses into the character of an appointment—an invitation for the convergence and intertwining of diverse ideas and perspectives. Within this crucible of convergence, fertile grounds are laid bare, nurturing the emergence of novel insights that boldly challenge preconceived notions and propel the trajectory of intellectual discourse ever forward.

Inextricably woven into the fabric of Derrida’s critique of logocentrism are profound implications for the domain of art criticism. Critics are enjoined to embrace the inherent fluidity and malleability of language, particularly in a world where the omnipresence of absolute and fixed meanings holds sway. By acknowledging the ceaseless potential for reinterpretation and recontextualization latent within every sign and expression, critics emancipate themselves from the fetters imposed by entrenched meanings, embarking upon an odyssey of discovery that lays bare new strata of significance and fosters a dynamic engagement with artistic oeuvres.

Furthermore, the concept of collage, positioned as the “borderline case” of citation, resonates with resounding echoes in the realm of art criticism. An analytical approach that transcends superficial judgments and preconceived categories is the need of the hour. Analogous to the dexterous collage artist who adroitly assembles disparate fragments, the art critic deftly weaves together a tapestry of diverse perspectives, historical contexts, and theoretical frameworks to forge a comprehensive understanding of the artwork under contemplation. By pushing the boundaries of citation and daring to challenge established norms, the discerning critic lays open new avenues of interpretation, fostering a more robust and multidimensional dialogue between the artwork and its audience.

In the domain of art, where the interplay of signs and symbols stands as the very fulcrum of the creative process, Derrida’s critique of logocentrism reverberates with potent resonance. By apprehending that language does not operate within the binary paradigm of signifier/signified pairs but rather burgeons forth through pairers or couplers, the artist finds emancipation from the shackles of fixed meaning. This profound realization bequeaths unto the artist a sense of unfettered freedom and boundless potentiality, thereby empowering experimentation with diverse materials, techniques, and conceptual frameworks sans the encumbrance of predetermined interpretations.

Within the crucible of my artistic praxis, I ardently espouse the act of citation as an instrument for transcending established contexts and engendering new strata of meaning. Through the meticulous incorporation of borrowed fragments, images, and concepts into the warp and weft of my creations, I painstakingly weave a tapestry of reference that transcends the limitations of their primordial contexts. It is my earnest aspiration to interrogate conventional modes of comprehension, inviting viewers to partake in a dynamic dialogue with the resulting kaleidoscope of interpretations and associations.

Collage, entrenched as the “borderline case” of citation, assumes a pivotal role within my artistic arsenal. Through the amalgamation of disparate elements, I orchestrate visual narratives that obfuscate the distinction between the familiar and the foreign. The juxtaposition of divergent images and materials begets unforeseen associations, compelling viewers to interrogate their preconceived notions and thus fostering a multifaceted examination of the artwork from sundry vantage points.

The theory of writing proffered by Derrida, wherein writing is cast as an appointment, serves as an inspiring beacon, beckoning me to perceive my artistic praxis as a realm of convergence and dialogue. Through my creative endeavors, I aspire to instigate conversations among diverse artistic traditions, historical epochs, and cultural milieus. By weaving and permitting the interplay of these disparate influences, I envision challenging ossified hierarchies and cultivating a profound sense of interconnectedness that transcends the temporal and spatial boundaries.

By embracing the fluidity inherent in language, harnessing the transformative potency of quotation and collage, and embarking upon an unceasing process of exploration and reinterpretation, my artistic pursuits seek to beget works that beckon viewers into a dynamic and transformative communion. I harbor aspirations of making a substantive contribution to the vibrant tapestry of human creativity by pushing against the confines, questioning established norms, and contributing to the perpetually shifting terrain of artistic expression.

Jacques Derrida, “Of Grammatology” (France)
Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, “Outside in the Teaching Machine” (India/USA)
Martin Heidegger, “Being and Time” (Germany)
Judith Butler, “Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity” (USA)
Paul de Man, “Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism” (Belgium/USA)
Jacques Lacan, “Écrits: A Selection” (France)
Emmanuel Levinas, “Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority” (Lithuania/France)
Michel Foucault, “The Archaeology of Knowledge” (France)
Hélène Cixous, “Three Steps on the Ladder of Writing” (Algeria/France)
Barbara Johnson, “The Critical Difference: Essays in the Contemporary Rhetoric of Reading” (USA)