As if to pique one’s intellectual curiosity, the proposition emerges that the inherent purpose of news is the expeditious relegation of recent historical events to the depths of the past. Within the confines of our contemporary world, where a constant barrage of information assaults our senses and our attention spans are markedly diminished, the news serves as a vessel symbolizing the ephemeral nature of events. Paradoxically, its primary function appears to be the dissemination of information, despite the fact that it also facilitates forgetfulness. Inadvertently, the informative function of the media, which ostensibly serves a noble purpose, becomes a mechanism that actively promotes our collective historical amnesia.

In the past, profound reflection was essential to comprehending the world. Both the mirror and the stage presented themselves as fertile grounds for introspection and reflection. Yet, the emergence of modern communication technologies has spawned a world devoid of contemplation, one in which actions unfold rapidly and efficiently. This communication veneer, which is smooth and devoid of profound introspection, propels humanity forward without allowing us to consider the consequences of our actions.

The very fabric of our society has undergone a profound transformation. The Faustian, Promethean, and Oedipal eras of production and consumption, characterized by an insatiable desire for progress and power, gradually cede their dominance to a new era: the age of networks, aptly dubbed the “proteic” era. We have succumbed to a narcissistic tendency that derives pleasure from establishing connections, maintaining contacts, and reveling in the proximity of information in this era. It manifests as an age characterized by perpetual feedback loops and an ever-expanding realm of interfacial communication.

With the introduction of social media, the groundwork has been laid for the emergence of hyperreality. What was once restricted to the realm of psychological and mental projections, experienced metaphorically or depicted metaphorically, has now acquired tangible substance in the fabric of reality. We find ourselves traversing an absolute expanse of simulated space as the distinction between the simulated and the actual becomes increasingly hazy. What was once confined to the limits of our imagination now unfolds before our eyes, devoid of any metaphorical interpretation. We now live in a world where the line between reality and simulation is gradually blurring.

Art, a durable medium that has traditionally been associated with introspection and expressive profundity, finds itself entangled in the turbulence of this new paradigm. The significance and difficulty of the artist’s role in society are growing at an exponential rate. How does one navigate deftly the complex relationship between reality and simulation? How can art, in the face of an impenetrable and seamless communication surface, retain its inherent capacity to elicit reflective thought and critical engagement? These ponderous questions linger in my mind, compelling me to investigate the artistic endeavors that have emerged as a direct response to this age of hyperreality and to seek out the works that hold a reflective mirror to our collective amnesia and fervently urge us to recall.

In this era of hyperreality, the importance of art has assumed a new prominence. It emerges as a potent tool that allows us to navigate the treacherous terrain of the non-reflective surface, where communication unfolds at a rapid rate. Art has the potential to disrupt the uninterrupted smoothness of this surface, allowing for moments of introspection and encouraging critical engagement.

I am irresistibly drawn to artists who bravely confront the challenges of our hyperreal age. They delve deeply into the distinctions between simulation and reality and boldly question the very fabric of our constructed world. By means of their artistic endeavors, they expose the mechanisms that perpetuate historical amnesia, thereby revealing the fault lines beneath the apparently flawless operational surface.

These visionary artists engage in an investigation of the interfacial realm of communication, deftly employing a variety of mediums to provoke profound reflection and enliven our senses. They deftly navigate the labyrinthine social media networks, forging connections that transcend the realm of superficiality that dominates our interactions. In the midst of a sea of digital noise, they serve as a poignant reminder of the immeasurable value of genuine human connection.

These artists confront the hyperreal with courage by dismantling the very concept of authenticity. By purposefully erasing the boundaries between reality and simulation, they extend a heartfelt invitation to viewers, urging them to question their perceptions and preconceived notions. They mount a profound critique of the hyperreality era through their artistic endeavors, compelling us to pause, reflect, and reclaim our agency in the face of an overwhelming information barrage.

Art assumes the mantle of resistance in this context. It serves as a constant reminder that the world has dimensions that extend beyond the realm of the senses, that beneath the glossy veneer of the non-reflective surface lies a profound depth that can only be discovered through introspection and reflection. Art transforms into a potent antidote to historical amnesia — a means to remember and reevaluate our past, thereby shaping a future imbued with enlightenment and responsibility.

However, it is crucial to recognize that the advent of the hyperreal era does not negate the value of reflection and contemplation inherently. Instead, it presents artists with a brand-new set of challenges to overcome. To create art that stimulates meaningful dialogue and encourages viewers to question the narratives presented to them, artists must adapt and discover innovative methods for penetrating hyperreality’s impenetrable surface.

The rise of hyperreality and the decline of reflection in contemporary society require a rethinking of art’s function. Artists and art critics alike must accept the challenges posed by the nonreflective surface that characterizes modern communication. Through artistic exploration and interpretation, we can navigate the labyrinthine complexities of the social media age, transcend the superficial veneer of hyperreality, and forge connections that resonate profoundly within our collective consciousness in a world increasingly defined by the intricate interplay between reality and simulation.

Jean Baudrillard, “Simulacra and Simulation” (France)
Marshall McLuhan, “Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man” (Canada)
Guy Debord, “The Society of the Spectacle” (France)
Umberto Eco, “Travels in Hyperreality” (Italy)
Mark Fisher, “Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative?” (United Kingdom)
Neil Postman, “Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business” (United States)
Jean-François Lyotard, “The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge” (France)
Walter Benjamin, “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction” (Germany)
Slavoj Žižek, “The Sublime Object of Ideology” (Slovenia)
Rosalind Krauss, “The Originality of the Avant-Garde and Other Modernist Myths” (United States)